Thursday, May 21, 2009

Pacific heights

Under the reasoning given and understanding, the home owner has these rights which were violated drastic violated. One: the right to investigate property under said management. By changing the locks and preventing the owner from entering upkeep can not be mantained and their for unlawfully prevents the owner from providing his duty. Two: violation of Contract as well as a lack there of. Littarly The man made a verbal contract saying and wishing to pay for his rent and never did. Under that a contract was never writen and property was not handed over so there for the resident was not a resident but a trasspasser. These are only a few and there for in their own allow the owner to turn off, evict, or report said Trasspasser and have them removed from the primeses. Also under law any disruption to said naboring areas including other rooms after warning has been given would be remarked as public diruption. On top of that undo cunstruction or deconstruction would be illegal by prospect and lack of permit to work on property.

No comments:

Post a Comment